Montag, 29. April 2013

Napolitano on the theft of the Mona Lisa


Mona Lisa – an influential painting


“I hate art”. “That is quite a strong statement darling, why have you broken with art at such an early stage in your life?” “Well, we have this assignment to describe how we feel about the Mona Lisa and quite frankly I don’t feel anything. To me it just looks like an average portrait. I really don’t understand all the fuss about it.” “I do not blame you my darling, I was never the artistic type myself but the Mona Lisa really is a very influential painting. Actually, you might even say that it had an impact on my personal life.
This has nothing to do with smile though. For me, as Secretary of Homeland Security, the Mona Lisa, or more specifically the theft of the painting in 1911, made way to the mean of identifying people we use today: The fingerprinting system. Its predecessor, Bertillonage, worked quite differently. In Bertillonage, which was invented in the 19th century by the Frenchman Alphonse Bertillon, several distinctive body features, like width of head or length of right ear, were measured and catalogued. So when a criminal was caught his body measurements were compared to those in the catalogue in the hope of getting a match. This system contained a number of flaws, for example were the measurements often inexact as every officer took them a lit bit differently.
 Critcs’ voices rose but it was the theft of our lovely smiling lady that was the undoing of Bertillonage. As the theft had caused a public uproar and one conspiracy theory chased the other the government wanted the case resolved as soon as possible. Bertillon was personally summoned to the crime scene and even managed to secure a fingerprint. He and his colleagues engaged in seven months of comparing I with thousands of data cards but found no match.
When the painting was finally regained two years later it turned out that the thief had actually beenin Bertillone’s files all along. They just could not find a match because it was the left thumbprint that was left on the crime scene and the right one that was in the files. Needless to say, this incident caused the police to rethink their tactics.

2 Kommentare:

  1. Dear Anna,

    To begin with, I relly liked how you started your text; the dialog was a very nice idea for an introduction. I also noticed that you changed the register depending on who is speaking (don't and do not). However, I would start a new sentence here "Why have you broken with art at such an early stage in your life?" instead of connecting it with a comma. Then, I am not quite sure what you mean with "Actually, you might even say that it had an impact on my personal life." Why would the theft of the Mona Lisa have an impact on her personal life? Towards the end you have some mistakes: "...in seven months of comparing I with thousands of..." the "I" does not belong here; "...thief had actually beenin Bertillone’s..." should be "been in Bertillion's". Furthermore, I would change "...was the left thumbprint that was left on the crime scene" into "that was found on the crime scene". Apart from that I really liked your text :)

    AntwortenLöschen
  2. Thank you Katja!!!

    with "had an impact on my life" I wanted to draw a connection between Napolitano and fingerprinting. Like, if the Mona Lisa hadn't been stolen maybe Bertillonage would still be the common practice. But it is indeed a bit vague ...

    I really appreciate your feedback!

    AntwortenLöschen